In the world of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC), precise cost estimation is vital. Whether you are working on projects in the chemical, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, utility, or metallurgical sectors, a structured cost estimate classification system helps in managing and controlling project costs. In this article, we will explore the AACE International’s 18R-97: Cost Estimate Classification System for EPC projects in the process industries, which serves as a standardized guide for managing cost estimates.
- Introduction
- Overview of the 18R-97 Classification System
- Notes:
- Importance of Cost Estimate Classification
- Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs) and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)
- Role of Electrical One-Line Diagrams
- Estimating Mechanical and Civil Work Costs
- Substations and Utility Requirements
- EPC Project Phases and Estimate Classification
- Key Factors Affecting Cost Estimates
- Conclusion
- FAQs
Introduction
Cost estimation is a fundamental aspect of project planning. It enables the estimation of the total expenditure required to complete a project and is crucial for decision-making. The 18R-97 Cost Estimate Classification System is designed specifically for projects in industries that rely heavily on process flow diagrams (PFDs), piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), and electrical one-line drawings. These documents form the backbone of the scope of work for cost estimation in process industries.
The process industries mentioned here include:
- Chemical manufacturing
- Petrochemicals
- Pharmaceuticals
- Utility plants
- Metallurgical plants
- Conversion plants
- And more similar industries
Quiz on Cost Estimate Classification System for Process Industries
1. What is the primary purpose of the AACE 18R-97 Cost Estimate Classification System?
Choose the correct answer:
Choose the correct answer:
Correct Option: D) To improve the accuracy of cost estimates in process industries. The AACE 18R-97 system aims to standardize cost estimating procedures, improving consistency and reliability. This is essential in industries like chemical and pharmaceutical sectors where precise budgeting is critical.
2. Which class of the AACE 18R-97 system is used for feasibility studies?
Choose the correct answer:
Choose the correct answer:
Correct Option: D) Class 5. Class 5 estimates are used for feasibility studies and concept screening, with an expected accuracy range of -50% to +100%. This allows stakeholders to evaluate the potential viability of a project at a very early stage.
3. What does Class 2 estimate typically focus on?
Choose the correct answer:
Choose the correct answer:
Correct Option: B) Control and bid preparation. Class 2 estimates are used during construction planning and control budgets, providing a detailed breakdown with an expected accuracy range of -15% to +20%. This class is crucial for ensuring that bids align with project scope and budget.
4. Which of the following factors affects the accuracy of cost estimates?
Choose the correct answer:
Choose the correct answer:
Correct Option: A) Scope definition. A poorly defined project scope can lead to significant inaccuracies in cost estimates, as it may result in unaccounted expenses or oversights in project planning. Clear scope definition is essential for accurate cost estimation.
Overview of the 18R-97 Classification System
The AACE 18R-97 Classification System is a globally recognized framework designed to standardize cost estimating procedures across the process industries. Its purpose is to improve the consistency and reliability of cost estimates, helping stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding project feasibility, budgeting, and risk management.
The system categorizes cost estimates into five different classes, with each class representing a level of project definition and the accuracy of the estimate.
Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between estimate accuracy and the corresponding estimate classes, which align with the maturity level of project definition. For a typical Class 5 estimate in process industries, the accuracy range can vary significantly depending on factors such as project complexity, available reference data, and the level of contingency included. Accuracy can range from -50% to +100% or, in some cases, be narrower at -20% to +30%. These ranges emphasize the need for well-quantified contingency to account for uncertainties and project risks.
Cost Estimate Classes
The overlap in accuracy ranges between estimate classes is also notable. For example, a Class 5 estimate for a project with reliable cost history may have similar accuracy to a Class 3 estimate for a new, technologically complex project. This is why Table 1 presents accuracy ranges that allow for variability based on project specifics. The final accuracy should always be determined through a thorough risk analysis rather than relying solely on predetermined ranges.
If contingency is properly managed, approximately 80% of projects will fall within the accuracy ranges shown in Figure 1. However, for more complex or risky projects, actual results may fall outside these ranges, sometimes significantly so. Research indicates that in such cases, the upper accuracy ranges could be two to three times higher than those shown in Table 1, underscoring the importance of effective risk management in cost estimation.
The five estimate classes are:
- Class 5: Concept Screening Estimates
- Typical use: Feasibility study, conceptual design.
- Expected accuracy range: -50% to +100%.
- Typical level of project definition: 0-2%.
- Class 4: Study or Feasibility Estimates
- Typical use: Preliminary budget approval.
- Expected accuracy range: -30% to +50%.
- Typical level of project definition: 1-15%.
- Class 3: Budget Authorization Estimates
- Typical use: Detailed design, funding approval.
- Expected accuracy range: -20% to +30%.
- Typical level of project definition: 10-40%.
- Class 2: Control or Bid Estimates
- Typical use: Construction planning, control budgets.
- Expected accuracy range: -15% to +20%.
- Typical level of project definition: 30-70%.
- Class 1: Definitive Estimates
- Typical use: Procurement, construction, and control.
- Expected accuracy range: -10% to +15%.
- Typical level of project definition: 50-100%.
Each class is linked to a certain phase of the project life cycle and reflects the increasing precision as more project details are defined.
Table 1: Key Characteristics of Estimate Classes
| Primary Characteristic | Estimate Class | Maturity Level of Project Definition Deliverables | End Usage (Typical Purpose of Estimate) | Typical Estimating Methodology | Expected Accuracy Range (Low – High) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 5 | 0% to 2% | Concept screening | Parametric models, judgment, or analogy | L: -20% to -50% | H: +30% to +100% |
| Class 4 | 1% to 15% | Feasibility | Equipment factored or parametric models | L: -15% to -30% | H: +20% to +50% |
| Class 3 | 10% to 40% | Budget authorization | Semi-detailed unit costs with assembly-level line items | L: -10% to -20% | H: +10% to +30% |
| Class 2 | 30% to 75% | Control or bid/tender | Detailed unit cost with forced detailed take-off | L: -5% to -15% | H: +5% to +20% |
| Class 1 | 65% to 100% | Check estimate or bid/tender | Detailed unit cost with detailed take-off | L: -3% to -10% | H: +3% to +15% |
Notes:
- Maturity Level refers to how well the project scope is defined.
- End Usage shows the typical purpose for which the estimate is intended.
- Typical Estimating Methodology represents the approach or method used for calculating the estimate at each class.
- Expected Accuracy Range gives the potential variation in the cost estimate, with L representing the low end and H representing the high end.
Importance of Cost Estimate Classification
The classification system provides a consistent approach to managing cost estimates for complex EPC projects. It helps project managers, engineers, and financial planners understand:
- Level of Risk: The system illustrates the degree of uncertainty at each class level, highlighting potential risks.
- Budgeting Needs: It helps align cost estimates with project funding stages, ensuring appropriate resource allocation.
- Schedule Coordination: Estimating at different stages ensures that both cost and scheduling goals are in sync.
Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs) and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)
Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs)
PFDs provide a visual representation of the major equipment and flow paths within the facility. These diagrams are crucial in defining the project scope for cost estimation. A typical PFD includes:
- Major equipment items (reactors, pumps, etc.)
- Process streams (inputs, outputs)
- Operating conditions (temperature, pressure)
- Basic control schemes
Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)
P&IDs offer a more detailed schematic that incorporates all piping, instrumentation, and control equipment in the process. They provide important details for cost estimation in EPC projects:
- Equipment connections
- Instrumentation locations
- Control schemes
- Detailed piping layouts
Both PFDs and P&IDs are used extensively in the cost estimate classification system, as they define the mechanical, electrical, and control scope of work.
Role of Electrical One-Line Diagrams
Electrical one-line diagrams play a vital role in estimating the cost associated with electrical infrastructure in process industries. They present a simplified overview of the electrical distribution system, which includes:
- Transformers
- Circuit breakers
- Bus bars
- Electrical panels
This documentation is key for estimating costs in the electrical, instrumentation, and control (EIC) aspects of the project.
Estimating Mechanical and Civil Work Costs
The process industries depend on heavy mechanical and civil construction. Some typical elements that form a large part of the cost estimates include:
- Mechanical Equipment: Pumps, compressors, reactors, heat exchangers, etc.
- Civil Work: Foundations, structures, roadways, and substation construction.
Projects involving pumping and compression stations or terminal tank facilities often have substantial mechanical and civil components.
Substations and Utility Requirements
Substations are critical elements in process plant facilities. The cost estimates for these systems include not only the physical construction but also the complex integration of electrical and control systems. Process industries often require dedicated utility infrastructures such as steam, compressed air, cooling water, and other systems essential for plant operations.
EPC Project Phases and Estimate Classification
EPC projects typically follow several distinct phases:
- Feasibility Study: Class 5 estimates help in evaluating whether a project is worth pursuing.
- Front-End Engineering Design (FEED): Class 3 and Class 4 estimates help refine the project cost as more engineering details become available.
- Detail Design and Procurement: Class 2 estimates provide a detailed breakdown of construction, procurement, and installation costs.
- Construction and Commissioning: Class 1 estimates offer the final, definitive budget used for cost control during execution.
Each phase demands increasingly detailed cost estimates, reflecting the greater accuracy that comes from more project definition.
Key Factors Affecting Cost Estimates
Several factors affect the accuracy of cost estimates, especially in process industries:
- Scope Definition: A poorly defined project scope results in inaccurate estimates.
- Market Conditions: Fluctuations in material prices, labor rates, and availability affect cost estimates.
- Location Factors: Costs for labor, materials, and logistics vary significantly based on the project’s location.
- Design Complexity: Projects with complex design features, such as non-standard equipment or materials, will have less predictable costs.
Conclusion
The 18R-97 Cost Estimate Classification System provides a structured and methodical approach to project cost estimation in the process industries. It helps project stakeholders navigate through the uncertainties of EPC projects, ensuring that budgets are realistic and align with the various stages of the project life cycle.
With detailed cost estimation processes and the integration of important documents such as PFDs, P&IDs, and electrical one-lines, stakeholders are well-equipped to manage the financial aspects of complex projects.
FAQs
- What is the AACE 18R-97 Cost Estimate Classification System? The 18R-97 system is a structured guide used for classifying cost estimates in EPC projects, primarily in the process industries.
- How many classes are there in the 18R-97 system? There are five classes, ranging from Class 5 (concept screening) to Class 1 (definitive estimates).
- Why are PFDs and P&IDs important in cost estimation? These diagrams define the scope of mechanical, electrical, and control work, making them crucial for accurate cost estimation.
- What factors affect cost estimate accuracy in EPC projects? Key factors include scope definition, market conditions, location, and design complexity.
- Which industries benefit from the 18R-97 system? Industries such as chemicals, petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, utilities, and metallurgical sectors benefit from this system.
Check 75+ Free Courses on EPCLAND
Popular courses by EPCLAND on Piping Engineering:
- Complete Course on Piping Engineering
- Piping Layout Engineering
- Piping Material Engineering
- Piping Stress Analysis
- All Courses Published on EPCLAND Platform
Top Short Courses on valves by EPCLAND:
- 14 Components of API 6A Gate Valve
- 14 Components of API 6D Valves
- 58 Components of API 602 Gate Valves
- 17 Components of API 600 Gate Valves
- Valve Material Specifications (VMS) – Comprehensive Guide
Important Links
- Video Series on Comparison of Piping Items: Check here
- Join Biggest Telegram Community of Piping Engineering: Click Here
- Subscribe YouTube channel: Click Here
- Check All Published courses: Click Here
- Read published technical Articles: Click Here
#Epcland #Pipingcourses #PIpingengineering #pipingonlinecourses #atulsingla
